Judge Slaps Down Trump on Deported Dad After SCOTUS Ruling
The ruling comes on the heels of a Supreme Court judgment requiring the administration to return Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia from El Salvador
Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images
The Trump administration must “take all available steps to facilitate the return” of a man wrongfully deported to El Salvador, a federal judge ruled Friday.
“The order properly requires the Government to ‘facilitate’ Abrego Garcia’s release from custody in El Salvador and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador,” Maryland District Court Judge Paula Xinis wrote.
Xinis, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, called an in-person status conference for Friday afternoon—a progress report to ascertain where Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia is and what his custodial status is. The conference will also seek to determine what Trump and his team have done—and plan to do—to get him home.
Department of Justice lawyers want the deadline changed to Wednesday, April 16—two days after a U.S. visit by the El Salvadorian president. The request has not been granted.
Garcia is a sheet metal worker who has a permit to work in the U.S. His wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, is a U.S. citizen.
The ruling comes on the heels of a Supreme Court ruling Thursday declaring that the Trump administration must take steps to bring Garcia home.
Sign Up for The Swamp Newsletter
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Trump and his team had tried to wash their hands of the matter, stating that Garcia was no longer their problem because he was outside of the U.S.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor rejected the administration’s argument that it couldn’t be held accountable for Garcia because he was no longer in the country as “plainly wrong.”
The 29-year-old was accused of being a member of the MS-13 gang and deported. The government admitted this was in error, but the father was sent to a mega prison in El Salvador.
Kilmar Abrego Garcia.
U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland
A Department of Justice spokesperson said in a statement that “this ruling once again illustrates that activist judges do not have the jurisdiction to seize control of the President’s authority to conduct foreign policy.”
See more of our coverage in your search results.
Got a tip? Send it to The Daily Beast here.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.