Uber Crash Suit Blocked After Couple’s Daughter Agreed to Uber Eats Terms
A New Jersey court ruled that the ride-sharing company can enforce an arbitration agreement to prevent a couple from pursuing legal action after a crash.

Screenshot/Today
A New Jersey couple injured during an Uber ride has been blocked from pursuing legal action after the ride-share company argued that a clause their young daughter agreed to when ordering pizza from Uber Eats prevented them from taking the company to court.
John and Georgia McGinty were critically injured in a March 2022 car crash when their Uber driver ran a red light, according to court filings.
However, a New Jersey court of appeals sided with the tech company in a Sept. 20 decision and ruled that the McGintys could not take legal action for personal injury claims because someone using Georgia’s phone accepted an arbitration agreement in January 2022.
The Guardian reported that the couple believes it was their daughter, then 12 years old at the time, who accepted the terms before ordering the pizza and said they were “surprised and heartbroken” that a company as large as Uber would enforce the arbitration to skate liability.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Dozens of pages on an iPhone screen during a food delivery order make it impossible that anyone could understand what rights they were potentially waiving or how drastic the consequences could be,” the couple said.
Get the best of The Beast delivered right to your inbox
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
After a lower court ruled in favor of the McGintys, the New Jersey superior court appellate division reversed the decision ruling that the agreement that “Georgia or her minor daughter, while using her cell phone, agreed to” was “valid and enforceable.”
The McGintys told the Today show that they plan to appeal the court’s decision, but their story is only the latest case of a company using arbitration agreements pushed out from their other platforms.
A widower attempted to bring a wrongful death lawsuit against Disney this summer after his wife fatally had an allergic reaction to food she ate at Disney World. However, the company cited the terms his wife agreed upon through a free trial of its Disney+ streaming platform to try having the lawsuit dismissed.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
