Blogs and Stories
Don Imus' Second Act
Richard Drew / AP Photo
With a strong debut on Fox Business Network, Don Imus is back in ring and talking about race again—and Al Sharpton’s "monitoring" the situation. But one top media buyer is balking: "I don't get the concept of radio on TV."
Thirty-eight minutes into his Monday morning debut on the Fox Business Network—a much-heralded return to brand-name cable after 2 ½ years in exile—Don Imus couldn’t help but start musing about “The Incident,” the blunder that nearly killed his career and has shaped his image ever since.
“My reaction to The Incident was purely personal,” Imus said, before slipping into a self-conscious meditation on race and Barack Obama. The Incident, of course, was his catastrophic quip on April 4, 2007 about the Rutgers University women’s basketball team (“nappy-headed hos,” in case anyone has forgotten) and his subsequent punishment and humiliation—going on the Rev. Al Sharpton’s radio show to grovel and apologize, only to be coldly rebuffed; getting fired from his syndicated radio show, which he’d been doing day in and day out for four decades, and being removed from MSNBC, where the cable simulcast of his radio program had filled the 6-to-9 a.m. time slot for the previous 11 years.
The question remains: Will Imus’ older-skewing audience stick around for the business news when they could be watching CNBC?
Now the 69-year-old Imus, battling prostate cancer and looking waxy and thin—“like an anorexic fly-rod with a cowboy hat,” in the words of his longtime sidekick, news reader Charles McCord—is finally back in the saddle. But two days in, it’s unclear where his horse is headed, exactly.
“I thought it wasn’t a horrible idea to put a black face in the White House,” Imus ventured to his very first guest, journalist Debra Dickerson, who—coincidentally or not—happens to be African American. “It doesn’t seem like it has done all that much for race relations—or has it?”
Dickerson—on the phone from Albany—argued that “a large segment of the white population cannot bear” the thought of a black president, hence the frequent insinuations of foreign birth, fascism, socialism, and all-around otherness. “‘I want my country back’—that’s about more than just power,” Dickerson said as Imus, on his best behavior, listened respectfully. “Talking about the Nazis? What is that about?... It’s heartbreaking to me… It’s just a very ugly time in America.”
The I-Man’s next guest: Glenn Beck—the reckless purveyor of everything Dickerson was complaining about. The Fox News star made fun of Dickerson and then compared notes with Imus on their mutual bouts with alcoholism (Beck’s poison: Jack Daniel’s; Imus’: Stolichnaya).
“Really? Glenn Beck was next? Now I kind of feel icky. I feel a little dirty,” Dickerson sighed when I caught up with her a few hours later. “Ha ha,” she added dryly, when I told her that Imus, in a discussion with another first-day guest, Sen. John McCain, repeated a “joke” that after 9/11 “President Obama was the second attack on America.” (McCain, on the phone, laughed more heartily.) Dickerson said Imus, whom she has gotten to know since she began appearing on his radio show a couple of years ago, was very keen on booking her for his FBN debut. “He kept asking and asking,” she said.
Was she was being used as a racial fig leaf?
“Call me naïve, but I think he just likes me,” Dickerson said, noting that she was initially reluctant to go on two years ago, but her journalism students at the State University of New York insisted she had to. “I think he was so brutalized by what he did and by what he has suffered, maybe he likes me because I have embraced him and defended him, and I think he likes and respects my work,” she said. “Maybe having me as a guest is another way to say to black women, ‘I’m really sorry for what I did.’” FBN representatives declined to make either Imus or network executives available for comment.
Fox News czar Roger Ailes has been wooing the radio jock for the past two years, and finally pried him loose from a reported $25 million contract with the rural-oriented RFD-TV network, flashing presumably bigger bucks to simulcast Imus’ Citadel-produced radio show and lift Fox Business Network out of the ratings basement. On that score alone, his initial outing has been a triumph: Imus’ debut reportedly racked up nearly 10 times the viewership that the two-year-old FBN typically attracts and even beat rival CNBC in total viewers. The performance was all the more impressive because FBN’s cable distribution—much of it on outlying digital channels—reaches barely half the nation’s 103 million homes.
But the question remains: Will Imus’ older-skewing audience stick around for the business news when they could be watching CNBC? There is certainly a loyal following for his patented shtick—trading politically incorrect barbs with a longtime crew of mostly aging white guys, with the more recent addition of black comic Tony Powell and the frequent appearances of Imus’ much younger wife, Deirdre, a former actress, and their loquacious 11-year-old son Wyatt (who showed up on Tuesday with the family pooch, Virgil, for an endless dog-training segment that seemed to belong on a fifth hour of the Today show).
But it has nothing to do with the financial fare that is CNBC’s meat and potatoes, never mind FBN’s regular cut-ins of “Fox Business Minutes.” And viewers aside, will advertisers get with the program and start investing a significant slice of their half billion in cable news advertising dollars?
Maybe not.
“I don’t get the concept of radio on TV,” said ad buyer Chris Geraci, managing director of national broadcasting for the New York-based media company OMD. “I also think Imus seems to be a disconnect from the business channel. I think to have done this, at a time period when their main competitor is actually reporting business news, seems a bit odd.”
The real answer, as with the stock market, is nobody knows, though some observers are bullish on Imus—analyst Brad Adgate of Horizon Media, for one.
“I would say he drives in viewers that advertisers might like, and helps FBN attract an audience, and also serves as a platform for the Fox networks to promote its other shows and other Fox personalities. In that sense, Imus helps elevate the profile of both FBN and Fox News.”
As for Imus’ almost career-ending lapse, “I think he has rehabilitated himself somewhat from his comments,” Adgate said. “But I think maybe in the back of people’s minds is that at some point he might do this again.”
In the meantime, Imus remains on racial probation.
“We never said he couldn’t work again,” Sharpton told me. “I think he paid a price. We’re monitoring him… In many ways, he invalidated his defenders when he said he was wrong and that there was no excuse for what he did. People have the right to express their views, but we’re dealing with language. So we’ll be watching.”
Lloyd Grove is Editor at Large for The Daily Beast. He is also a frequent contributor to New York magazine and was a contributing editor for Condé Nast Portfolio. He wrote a gossip column for the New York Daily News from 2003 to 2006. Prior to that, he wrote the Reliable Source column for the Washington Post, where he spent 23 years covering politics, the media, and other subjects.
For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.







bobesherman
I'm glad to see Imus back, but not on Fox.
mmurav
I agree! Leaving MS means that he will not have first rate news people coming on the program. Frank Rich is the exception. He is great.
Show should be TVO'ed to skip the Fox arm of the Republican Party.
rustycummings
I agree completely!
Meursault
Initial numbers notwithstanding, Imus is inert from the gate based on the same MO: still not funny, tired lame morning zoo shtick, self-promoting lower tier guests (Bo Dietl, really?), his on air "family," etc. Yet entirely appropriate as an alternative to the morons on "Fox and Friends."
diamondgirl
I watched/listened this morning, he was great, I loved it! It was a smart move, this station needed some serious help. I am so used to watching CNBC all day, and have been for years, they need a little more tweeking and it could work...
newswoman
Imus is a mean, grouchy, not very bright sexist. He HATED Hillary Clinton and insulted her every chance he got, but even worse, he called Condoleeza Rice a "snaggle-toothed witch". He was on the air way longer than he should have been and, I predict, he will not last long this time. His day is gone.
Noontime
I have no problem with Don Imus. In the Judeo-Christian tradition of forgiveness, I've chosen to forgive him for his nappy headed ho celebration of political incorrectness. I think he was sorry for what he said...at least at the time. I don't trust him, though.
The greater issue is Fox's interest in Imus. Where Fox is involved, race baiting can't be far behind. Is there anyone out there who doesn't think that the folks at Fox News are champing at the bit, just aching to lure Imus into another foray into race baiting incident where can insult black folks? Come on, that's what Fox is all about.
jon3425
Bet you've never watched any of the fox programs
And how exactly is the today show or olbermann any better?
I personally watch all the news sources, including NPR.
The thing FOX does better than anyone is engage in real debate, bringing in differing view points. (though I do hate the rah rah)
jomama
This is utterly rediculous, there is no 'debate' on FOX, they bring in people with radical and unsubstantiated viewpoints who yell at each other. Unfortunately, the viewers are too stupid to know any better. Olbermann is very biased obviously, but he's a reasonable and intelligent person. He's not calling the country to arms, nor making blatantly false accusations against anyone important.
Noontime
Umm..real debate? Glenn Beck is real debate? Really?
The Today Show? Can't recall the last time Matt Lauer said, without irony or humor, that Obama "hates white people." Olberman may be a left wing, snarky, smartass, but at the very least he's intelligent, funny, and entertaining. Can't say that for ANYONE at Fox.
mmurav
If you are interested in honest debate watch PBS's Newshour.
MinnesotaTom
I couldn't figure out how you watch all the news sources, "including NPR", but since you also believe that Fox engages in real debate (like Beck's crying rant about the President hating his mother because she was white) you probably also believe you can watch radio.
spotted
MinnesotaTom - LOL!
ThinkAgain
We have plenty of entertainment and political news options in the morning. I hope CNBC sticks to business and/or the politics of business even if it is a smaller audience.
macgregor
10 times the normal viewership of Fox Business Channel is not much to brag about. 177,000 compared to the usual 21,000? Wow! This is a network that literally runs a full page ad in the Wall Street journal every day to remind people that its even on the air. I guess Ailes is hoping that by infusing FBC with entertainers (like the ones who made Fox News so popular), they can beat CNBC. But unlike regular news, which is becoming more tabloid and personality driven, most business people like sober, reliable news (Jim Cramer is an anomaly, I'll give you that). Still, Imus is neither the buxom blonde template Fox has made famous, nor is he the seasoned but loud news voice shouting down detractors (see Hannity and O'Reilly). He's basically a washed up clown who mumbles his way through broadcasts, while occasionally uttering epithets and politically incorrect musings (that honestly come off more like non sequitur instead of hate speech). I challenge anyone to explain how Don Imus is going to invigorate that channel when he can barely hold his head up.
wakeupastc
I couldn't agree with you more, macgregor. this guy is one of the most unbelievably useless hacks in the business. i tried to listen to him years ago and found him dull-witted, flatfooted, and boring.
I also agree that this is probably a race-baiting move by Fox News. I hope they fall flat on their faces with this obvious and disgusting ploy.
and please, someone, get a clue and dump this useless no-talent, no brain.
DrEvil
I linked to you on "You Have To Be This Tall To Go On This Ride"
Last post. Stephen Colbert, Mr President, The Taliban Just Isn't That Into You.
This user is no longer registered.
n--Y--johnniegdailyplanet
Imus on a "business news" program? Huh? What are his credentials? Unless he going to pontificate on the buying and selling of cowboy hats, something he's had much experience with over the years, I question his expertise.
I loved Imus and Beck comparing past demons, "(Beck's poison: Jack Daniel's; Imus': Stolichnaya)." Like two teenage girls reminiscing over their obsession with favorite colors of nail polish.
pricklypear
He will interview people who do know business. He is a good interviewer.
dailyplanet
Well, I guess that says a lot about the pairing of the "sensationalist/tabloid" mindset of Fox with the "controversial" mouth that is Don Imus.
mmurav
I listened to then watch Imus for many, many years. He is a great interviewer. I will give him a month and if the show do not improve dramatically. I go back to NPR.
newswoman
Imus is toast and so he should be. Men seemed to like him more than women. Maybe that is because he was a sexist and a mean man. We women expect more in our entertainers, like a personality.
cawbogue
I suspect this may turn out to be a very smart move by Fox. For all of Imus's bluntness, he still manages to walk a very fine line when it comes to politics. I think he will expose a much wider audience to Fox Business and they will have success keeping some of them for their regular business programming. I hear some of the criticism of the show but .... compared to what ? If I didn't watch Imus, what's the alternative, Mike and Mike , Morning Joe, Fox News, CNBC .. I think he compares well to all of them.
jomama
That Beck's ratings are high in America is proof that the country cannot be trusted with nuclear weapons.
spotted
Those people shouldn't be trusted with scissors.
GPatton
I think Howard Stern should be on Fox too. And Soupy Sales! George Patton
wakeupastc
yet another inane remark frm george patton. actually, stern, for all his excesses, is a very smart guy - and ditto Soupy Sales. Imus never had a tenth of their intelligence, subtlety, or talent on the very best day of his life.
clearly, the irony in their humor is way over your head, patton.
MinnesotaTom
Imus is back on TV?! What a shock that he's on Fox, home to Glenn Beck "the president hates his mother because she is white". That Beck was on his show is perfect. Two drunks with racist views. How long before Imus makes another racist comment? A week?
spotted
Beck was more high-minded today, ending his show by debunking the rumors that flu shots contained tracking chips normally used for pets. A new low . . .
sailforth1
Imus is going to be Imus. He built his career around the persona he created and will continue to do that. In his own way he's no different than Stern, Limbaugh, or Beck. He's got his own political convictions and private opinions (one of which obviously slipped out regarding the Rutgers team) and he was ostracized for it. Hard to tell if he really feels remorse over the incident or just acquiesced to remain a headliner in the media. What's more telling in this article is that the author sought out Al Sharpton (who is also a racist and in the business of racism) to comment on Imus' status. Sharpton goes on to say that "We're monitoring him" and "So we'll be watching". Can't remember Al Sharpton ever being elected to public office or having that type of power bestowed upon him by a formal government agency. Sharpton is the black Imus with his self righteous, holier than thou attitude, and self appointed savior/defender of all things African American as long as he can make a buck off of it or at least get face time in the media. "They wasn't nothin' strange 'bout yo' daddy" Al. "What's strange is what he had to deal with" raising you. Sometimes irony is funny and sometimes sad. The author only legitimizes, otherwise illegitimate, influence by giving credence to idiots like Sharpton. Nice try, but I'm not buying it. This article had potential until the author followed the standard media line resulting in blase drivel. Might be better off writing for the National Enquirer where the journalistic standards are a bit looser and the clientele not so selective.
Noontime
Sailforth1:
"Can't remember Al Sharpton ever being elected to public office or having that type of power bestowed upon him by a formal government agency."
It seems that your "Imus being Imus" is a license of sorts. "Yeah, he's racist, but as long as we all know that it's okay for him to have a national audience."
But your real problem is with Al Sharpton? Really? You're right in one sense. He hasn't been elected to a public office. I think the pronoun "we" pertains to those of us who know he's a piece of shit and will gladly call him on that shit if/when it arises.
A while back a young, white gentlemen asked me if black people could be racist. My reply? Of course we can. While black folks can be, and in many cases, are racist, what does it matter? We don't have power. Barack Obama has power, and perhaps because of that, many black folks feel empowered. But the pervading corporate power structure in this country is still basically white.
And what if black folks are racist? We do what? Call you "honkey," or "cracker," refuse to help you with your groceries? So what? Now if I'm interviewing people for a job and decide that, based on the fact white folks make me "uncomfortable," I won't hire any, then my racism is a viable issue.
Lastly, your reference to Sharpton addressing Michael Jackson's children ("was't nothing strange about yo daddy") makes an otherwise legitimate post very, very suspect.
sailforth1
Noontime,
I can see how you could interpret my comments that way and perhaps my obvious lack of respect for Al Sharpton came through a bit on the strong side.
On "Imus being Imus" I am indeed saying that people should recognize him for what he is and if they choose to follow him then that's their choice. No different than those that follow Limbaugh or Glenn Beck (for God's sake how could anyone with a brain not see through those two?). It's not up to Al Sharpton to be the "media police". As long as media celebrities comply with FCC regulations regarding established standards then content is essentially a supply/demand situation. We don't have to like it but that's the way it is; Freedom of the Press.
I'm quite aware that people of all races have the capacity to be racist and again, that's a personal choice. I'm not providing criticism here on Sharpton being racist. I'm pointing out the ridiculous tendency of the media to bestow credibility on people like Sharpton, Limbaugh, Beck, Ann Coulter, et al. Race had nothing to do with my point.
Although I freely admit that I believe Al Sharpton makes his living by courting racism whether it exists (in every situation) or not. I happen to not respect him for that. It's one thing to fight legitimate racism, be an enabler for people, and an agent for change. It's quite another to be an "ambulance chaser" to gain notoriety and profit from it on a personal level. But, hey, that's just me.
And I wasn't attempting to show any disrespect towards the Jackson tragedy rather used Al's own words against him to point out irony.
Appreciate your feedback and enjoyed the conversation. Thanks.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.