Aiming for Afghan Middle Ground
An argument for lowering expectations in Afghanistan.
The American mission in Afghanistan should be made narrower, and more modest, so the U.S. can focus more resources on strengthening Pakistan, argues Richard Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations. The Afghan war is a war of choice, Haass writes in The Washington Post, and several key assumptions about it are wrong. Contrary to conventional wisdom, al Qaeda can re-form anywhere, not just in Taliban-controlled Afghanistan. Instead of sending in more troops, the military should refocus on training the Afghan army and police, reflecting “the Afghan reality of a weak center coexisting with strong warlords.” The goal should be a government than can limit the presence of terrorists. On the other hand, aid to Pakistan should rise dramatically, to help the country remain intact with tight control over both its nuclear weapons and the terrorists within its borders. “Anyone who thinks this is not bold enough should keep in mind that even modest objectives tend to be ambitious in this part of the world,” Haass warns.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.