Maximum Security’s Owners Take Fight Over Derby Disqualification to Court
Maximum Security’s owners argue that the Racing Commission and its stewards made the wrong call.

Brian Spurlock/Reuters
The owners of Maximum Security have filed a lawsuit in an attempt to overturn the disqualification of their horse in the Kentucky Derby earlier this month. Race officials disqualified the horse because he appeared to jump a puddle on the muddy racetrack, causing the trailing horses to slow down. A horse named Country House was controversially moved into first place after Maximum Security crossed the finish line first. Maximum Security’s owners contend the Kentucky Horse Racing Commission and its stewards made the wrong call. The suit requests for a reversal of the decision disqualifying Maximum Security and reinstatement of the original order of finish, confirming Security as winner.
“The insubstantiality of the evidence relied on by the stewards to disqualify Maximum Security, and the bizarre and unconstitutional process to which the Plaintiffs were subjected before and after the disqualification, are the subjects of this action,” an attorney for Security’s owners said in the complaint filed on Thursday. An initial appeal of the disqualification was turned down within hours because the racing commission rules state that the stewards’ findings “shall be final and not subject to appeal.”
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.