Post’s Ethics Still in Question
Editor knew lobbyist dinners were off-the-record.
The Washington Post’s infamous journalist-lobbyist dinners are back in the news. After the media caught wind of an epic ethics violation in the making—the dinners were promoted as an “off-the-record” schmooze session between Post journalists and DC insiders—the events were abruptly canceled, and general manager Charles Pelton was forced to step down for devising the promotion. Initially, Executive Editor Marcus Brauchli, whose reporters would have attended the dinners, avoided the controversy by claiming not to have known that the events were being sold as “off-the-record.” Today’s New York Times features a correction to this part of the story, having received a letter Brauchli sent to Pelton stating that he knew the nature of the events, and that the Times had “misunderstood” him. “I was aware, as I have said since July 2, that some materials described the proposed salon dinner as an off-the-record event,” said Brauchli on Saturday. “As I have also said before, I should have insisted that the language be changed before it surfaced in any marketing material."
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.