Ratings Agencies Ignored Bad Loans
According to testimony to oversight panel.
As the mortgage market was showing signs of failure in 2006, leading to the housing bubble that triggered the economic recession in 2008, ratings agencies deliberately ignored strong evidence that many of the loans were unsafe, according to testimony given last week to the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission. D. Keith Johnson, former president of Clayton Holdings—a company that analyzed mortgage pools for the Wall Street firms that sold them—told the commission that from January 2006 to June 2007, Clayton reviewed 911,000 loans for 23 investment or commercial banks, including Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, Merrill Lynch, Bear Stearns, and others, and found that not only were these banks placing the faulty loans into bundles known as mortgage securities, but nearly half failed to meet quality-control standards. Johnson took the data to officials at S&P, Fitch Ratings, and Moody's, to no avail. "We went to the ratings agencies and said, 'Wouldn't this information be great for you to have as you assign tranche levels of risk?'" Johnson testified. But if "any one of them would have adopted it, they would have lost market share."
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.