Trump Administration Directs Asylum Screeners to Be More Confrontational in Interviews: Report
New rules will require officials to provide “detailed written analysis” when referring asylum cases to immigration courts.

Jose Luis Gonzalez/Reuters
The Trump administration has reportedly set new guidelines for U.S. officers screening asylum seekers, directing them to scrutinize “discrepancies” in migrants’ stories and requiring officers to give specific justifications when they conclude a migrant has a legitimate “fear of harm” in their home country. According to internal emails and documents obtained by The Washington Post, the more “skeptical and confrontational approach” is supposed to crack down on legal “loopholes” that border officials claim have enabled more migrants to enter the U.S. through the southern border. Officers were instructed in an email to hone in on “detailed inconsistencies” between the asylum applicant’s interview and their other testimony. An asylum officer also told the Post the “huge” rule changes mandating officers write “detailed written analysis” while referring an applicant to court will make the application-approval process significantly more time consuming. Citizenship and Immigration Services and the White House reportedly did not respond to requests for comment.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.