British police announced this week that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor will not face prosecution over his attempts to have his protection detail investigate Virginia Giuffre.
However, in case you were thinking that the chips are starting to land quite neatly for Andrew, here comes a story in the Mail on Sunday saying he is set to move to a “temporary” Sandringham property the size of a “shoebox” when he vacates Royal Lodge next year.
Given that they regularly describe a six-bedroom home as a “cottage,” we wait with bated breath to see the royal definition of a “shoebox.”
Rest assured, Andrew is still in line for a “substantial home,” once renovations are complete.
The Mail says that the royals have been removing the contents of Royal Lodge under “cover of darkness,” trucking items “to a Windsor storage facility belonging to the Crown Estate.”
It’s still going to take some time to get him out of Royal Lodge as Andrew, a “natural hoarder,” has “filled rooms of his Windsor home with clutter and was not prepared to accept help sorting through his private collections.”
The Mail says, “some anterooms are filled to the ceiling with documents and photographs.”
The Real Message of Charles’ Cancer Speech
What mattered most about King Charles’ TV statement on Friday, in which he said he was doing well in his cancer battle, was not what it said about his illness, but what it signaled about power. This was an attempt to reassert authority over an institution that has drifted badly off the rails.
It is best understood as a strategic intervention rather than a health update. Carefully calibrated, optimistic without being definitive, it was designed to close down speculation and reclaim a narrative that slipped from the king’s grasp shortly after he ascended to the throne. The message was clear: things are improving, he is still here, and the story needs to move on.
That matters because the palace never intended to announce Charles had cancer at all. The plan was to talk about benign prostate treatment; the disclosure only came because secrecy became impossible.
What was framed as transparency had consequences. From the moment “cancer” was said out loud, attention shifted from Charles’ reign to its endpoint. Succession and William’s readiness became live issues far earlier than intended, and authority began to drain toward the heir. Once a monarch is publicly framed as vulnerable, power ebbs.
Yesterday’s statement was an attempt to halt that erosion. The briefing was telling: no remission, no victory lap, just talk of a “very positive stage” and reduced treatment. This was about changing the temperature, not declaring the battle won. Charles still has cancer. That has not changed. What has changed is the calculation that silence is damaging.
The timing was no accident. On the same day, a clearly briefed story appeared in the London Times stressing that Charles has not been in touch with Prince Harry since their brief meeting earlier this year. Read together, these were signals of authority. The king is saying he is not passive, not to be managed or emotionally leveraged. He is still in charge, even in his relationship with a son who has spent years monetizing grievance.
Which brings us to the real test. If Charles’ health is stabilizing and he is well enough to step back up, the era of half-measures must end. The monarchy has been battered by the unresolved Andrew scandal, poisoned by the Harry saga, and weakened by a visible collapse of discipline. Nothing illustrated that better than the appalling optics of the York family including Andrew wafting into a christening at a royal chapel in a royal palace, as if boundaries still do not matter.
If Charles is better, the obligation is not just reassurance about his health, but the imposition of order. This is a constitutional institution whose legitimacy depends on hierarchy, boundaries, and restraint. For too long, those lines have blurred, producing a monarchy that looks reactive and weak.
Yesterday marked a fork in the road. Either it signals a genuine reassertion of control, or it will be remembered as another moment when reassurance was mistaken for leadership. Sympathy is natural. It is also beside the point. The question now is whether Charles will get back on with the job: enforcing standards, restoring discipline, and running an institution that has been drifting for far too long.
Want more royal gossip, scoops and scandal? Head over to The Royalist on Substack
