The Financial Times is running a series this month on affirmative conservative policy ideas: what conservatives should be for, not just against. I was honored to contribute an entry on healthcare:
The reform, for all its many, many faults, did one important thing: extend health insurance coverage to almost all Americans. A Republican alternative should aspire to do the same. That statement is controversial in today’s GOP. It should not be. Universal coverage need not mean higher costs, nor more statism. But how to get there while meeting Republican concerns?
