Trump Goon’s Furious Attack on Key Ally Immediately Backfires
She was not happy with the way Scott Bessent spoke to her.
Nathan Howard/Nathan Howard/Reuters
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent was berated by his British counterpart, U.K. Chancellor Rachel Reeves, during a confrontation over her sharp criticism of the war in Iran, according to a report.
The pair got into a heated exchange while Reeves was in Washington, D.C., in April to attend the spring meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
Speaking at CNBC’s Invest in America forum, Reeves blasted Donald Trump’s war in Iran as a “mistake” with no clear objectives or endgame. She also dismissed the idea that the Middle East conflict means “we are safer today than we were a few weeks ago.”
Bessent later confronted Reeves over her comments that same day, the Financial Times reported. He argued the war is making the world safer by aiming to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, and pressed her on what would happen if Tehran carried out a nuclear attack on London.

Scott Bessent has largely enjoyed a good relationship with Rachel Reeves and other top U.K. officials.
Leon Neal/Getty Images
Reeves reportedly then “responded angrily” to Bessent’s comments and said he did not like the way he was speaking to her. Reeves also reminded Bessent that she did not work for him and reiterated her sharp criticisms of the war in Iran.
ADVERTISEMENT
The U.K. is among the top U.S. allies that have refused to be dragged into the Middle East conflict or assist Trump’s efforts to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
Just like in the U.S., the closure of the narrow shipping route has sent gas prices soaring in the U.K. In an interview last month, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he was “fed up” that the actions of Trump in Iran and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Ukraine were driving up energy bills for British families.
The younger Alito got the job in Scott Bessent's Treasury Department.
Brian Snyder/Brian Snyder/Reuters
Days later, Bessent told the BBC that the U.K. would have to accept a “small bit of economic pain” while Trump continues his war.
Sign Up for The Swamp Newsletter
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
“I wonder what the hit to global GDP would be if a nuclear weapon hit London,” Bessent said. “I am less concerned about short-term forecasts than long-term security.”
Bessent and Reeves have spoken since the fiery argument last month, but Reeves has continued to criticize the war.
“Rachel has been frank—in private and in public—about the mistakes of the war and the economic cost,” an unnamed U.K. official told the Financial Times.
The conflict is just as unpopular across the pond as it is in the U.S. An Ipsos poll conducted in early April found that 65 percent of the British public disapprove of the war.
A vast majority also expressed concern about its impact on fuel and energy prices (86 percent) in the U.K., and the broader economy (85 percent).
The Daily Beast has contacted the Department of the Treasury for comment.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.

ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in or create an account
Login dialog
Loading comments…
ADVERTISEMENT