Supreme Court Takes Up Fight Over Andy Warhol’s Prince Paintings
Photographer Lynn Goldsmith sued the late artist’s estate, alleging that Warhol had violated copyright laws by creating his Prince painting from her photograph.

Paul Hawthorne/Getty
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to take on a copyright case involving the Andy Warhol Foundation and the late artist’s 1984 painting of Prince known as “Orange Prince.” The dispute began in 2017 when photographer Lynn Goldsmith sued the estate, alleging that Warhol, who died in 1987, had violated copyright laws by modeling his rendering of Prince from her 1981 photo of the rockstar that appeared in Newsweek. The Manhattan court sided with Warhol, deciding that the painter had sufficiently transformed the image so that it did not infringe on Goldsmith’s work, Reuters reports. But when Goldsmith appealed, she found favor with the judge who agreed that Warhol’s painting did not have enough “new artistic purpose and character” to distinguish it from Goldsmith’s photo. The Supreme Court, however, agreed to accept the Warhol Foundation’s appeal of the appeal, arguing that to ultimately side with the photographer would cast a “cloud of legal uncertainty” around the entire nature of Warhol’s type of art.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.