Robert Durst’s Lawyer Argues His Clumsy First Killing Proves His Innocence in Other Two
Robert Durst’s attorney insists his client’s accidental killing of a man in 2001 shows that he didn’t kill his best friend or his wife.

Reuters/Al Seib
It’s a bold strategy to bring up your client’s first killing in an attempt to prove their innocence in other deaths, but that’s what accused serial killer Robert Durst’s representative did in court Wednesday. According to the Associated Press, Durst attorney Dick DeGuerin argued that the clumsy way his client disposed of the body of a man he accidentally killed in 2001 shows that he didn’t kill his best friend or his wife. DeGuerin said Durst left behind “hundreds of clues” after his killing of Morris Black—which he was acquitted for after arguing that it was in self-defense— including a garbage bag containing a body part and a receipt with Durst’s name on it. Meanwhile, Kathie Durst vanished in 1982, and the crime scene where Susan Berman’s body was found in 2000 was much more clinical, so the lawyer argued those cases are “significantly different.” However, Deputy District Attorney John Lewin said all three deaths are “interrelated,” arguing that they all link to Kathie Durst’s disappearance.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.